Posts Tagged ‘Bill of Rights’

The WordPress Take Down of Blogs for Violation of ToS–Is it Personal?

August 15, 2018

Folks, this blog right here you are reading could be next. WordPress, who I thought was above censorship–clearly they are NOT above censorship!–has taken down Dr. Eowyn’s “Fellowship of the Minds” and also, more recently, “American Everyman.” To my knowledge, neither blog has advocated hate speech or violence. Other independent blogs have also been taken down by WordPress. Since I have always like WordPress, this is a bothersome development; further, by taking WordPress to task over this censorship while being on a WordPress site, I may be taken down as well, and soon. I am NOT transferring any blogs to Blogger, however. It’s owner, Google, is even worse!

According to Dr. Eowyn, he has not been given a reason for this take down. Speculation around this appears to blame some “reporter”of something Dr. Eowyn wrote on his blog that perhaps was taken as offensive, advocating hate speech, or violence–according to this person’s opinion. Was it because Eowyn wrote about the take down of Alex Jones? (which on this very here blog I have written about not once, not twice, but thrice!)

Or was it personal? Did Dr. Eowyn “upset” some person, and then this person got revenge?

Because one thing is sure in this world–the days of growing thick skin have passed.

Thank God I have thick skin. When you were bullied as a teen and pre-teen, when you grew up wanting to be playing by yourself with clay figures and writing stories and making up book characters because you felt like everyone else thought you were ‘crazy,’ then the only way to ‘survive’ so to speak is to grow the thickest skin you can.

There are times I actually feel sorry for these thin-skinned SJWs. Emos, without all the make-up. And how will they deal with the world if the world doesn’t go along with their notions?

Advertisements

And Now More “Take Downs”–Why All of a Sudden All These Take Downs, and Now Microsoft is Getting into the Act by Wanting to Take Down Gab

August 9, 2018

If indeed the “take down” of Alex Jones was meant as an actual take down, and not just a scam Jones himself was involved with as I suggested yesterday (because it is rare to truly take down a Zionist), then let me ask this–why now? And I did ask something similar the other day, as to why–but it has turned into “why now”?

I know, I know…the censorship thing has been going on for months, where YouTube would suspend an account for a few days, or Facebook would do the same thing, or Twitter…

But why all of a sudden to begin this week has YouTube removed Alex Jones and InfoWars, followed by others? Nothing in this world is co-incidence. And I don’t have all the answers, but one thing is obvious–the criminal psycho elites must be getting scared or antsy or something for all of this to be getting ramped up now, even against avowed Zionists (do not forget–most of these Big Tech platforms are owned by….do the names Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Schmidt sound like a certain ethnicity or group of people? By the way, AJ, the Arabs do not control Hollywood, okay? So why would Khazarians aka “Jews” want to suppress a Zionist? I hope I can begin to answer this question). And I don’t think it is merely a psy-op or scam.

If one remembers, Facebook has been sued by various entities including the EU, for breach of security regarding something called Cambridge Analytica. Various govt. authorities have also called out Google and Facebook for violating GDPR rules and others. In other words, Big Tech was getting into big trouble, so Big Tech had to, perhaps, reign in the govts. they partially own, and the easiest way to do that is to partner with govts. Could it be that the deal is–as many are now–oh the stupidity!–for calling for govt. to make these Tech Giants “public utilities?” (As that “former Satanist” “styzhexenhammer666”  YouTube video  calls for…see a previous post where I bring up this dude who–on purpose–looks like a rock star–was he with the band Styx?) And, as I state in that post, calling for govts. to make Tech Giants “public utilities” as was done to “Ma Bell” many years ago is one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard!

Let me ask this question: Whom would you rather have censor you–a private company, where there are alternatives such as Gab or ButChute or Steemit you can choose if you so want to do, or the govt., where, because such and such is now a regulated public utility (while still being a private corporation as AT&T–“Ma Bell’s” successor–is still), the state would then have to right to completely abolish the Bill of Rights and its First Article that gives We the People freedom of speech and the press? Just for the convenience of it, you would allow the govt. to completely take away your rights? As I said in the previous past, the only person allowing you to be enslaved is YOU!

Or, would you just rather defend your right to free speech and press by either signing up with Gab or Bitchute and boycotting Facebook or YouTube, or others? Because you still have that choice…

Meanwhile, good ol’ Microsoft (folks, did you really think Apple was the only evil one here?) is fixing to ban Gab (as per this  link at 12160.info, a supposedly social network). Like I said, Big Tech is seemingly co-ordinating together their take down of free speech, including free speech by avowed Zionists.

So that might answer the “why now” question. But why did they begin with Alex Jones?

Because unlike me, or various independent blogs, vlogs, etc. run on either a shoestring budget or less or for free, AJ is a millionaire with one of the biggest outreaches in the US and everywhere else, including employing minions like Paul Jospeh Watson in the UK. That means Alex Jones is, to some extent, major competition for the likes of YouTube and others, and that could be another reason he was taken down first, or at least foremost, since the mainstream media is even going bonkers over it. Or because he has a
huge following. Or because of his Trump support–you might be aware of Trump’s war on Amazon and Jeff Bezos. Right now, at least, it seems like Big Tech is going to war with Not Quite Big Tech, or “Alt- Big-Tech” such as maybe Jones can be categorized as. Look at it this way–if Big Tech can go after the next wrung below them, what do you think they can do to us little guys in the game?

Alex Jones today. Corbett Report–a much more reliable and truthful website/YouTube channel (he does not have Facebook, so he says)–tomorrow. Somethinghappeninghere.wordpress.com a month from now? Heck, Google’s Blogger has already screwed me over! And will they take down WordPress, the ONLY true alternative to Google’s Blogger that I know of?

Prepare, folks, prepare.

Was the “Take Down of Alex Jones” Truly a Take Down?

August 8, 2018

I will begin by quoting the question with which I ended my previous post: ‘I will also try to explain why YouTube would ban–a Zionist or two?’

Exactly. Why would YouTube and other tech oligarch platforms ban two avowed Zionists–Tommy Robinson and Alex Jones?

One answer would be because they can: the owners of tech platforms can (to heck with freedom of speech and the press) ban whomever they want, and that is why they are doing it, and no declaration of “public utility” is going to change that–the regulators will see to that!

The answer that I think (with the two being avowed Zionists and all) makes a lot more sense is because Big Tech wants these two individuals to be banned in order to foster their agendas–what better way to piss off “conservatives” or “patriots” than to ban Alex Jones (and in England, Tommy Robinson)? And won’t these “pissed off” folks want to take it out on Antifa and like-minded SJWs and their fellow Soros-ian sock-puppets? And what better way to institute the “coming Civil War” Lisa Click-Bait and others are constantly spouting and driving toward? And what better way to completely divide and conquer us “useless eater/little people/dumbed down idiots” than to instigate a bogus civil
war where Antifa and Co. and “Conservative Patriots-MAGAs” kill each other off. And then, after Antifa and Alex Jones/InfoWars and all the other like-minded sites and videos and podcasts are gone, the rest of us who did not fall for this crap will be left with virtually nothing, online or offline truth- wise. And don’t forget, Big Tech and the govts. they own actually think the rest of us will be dependent on them for anything.

There is even the possibility (though I cannot prove it) that Alex Jones, at least, went along with the whole “take down” deal! This man, really really really, is controlled opposition–his avowed Zionism proves that. Only controlled opposition would denounce the “new world order” while defending Israel’s genocide of Palestinians! (By not denouncing this genocide, Alex, you are ultimately defending it!) Only controlled opposition would make the ridiculous claim that “the Arabs control Hollywood,” when everyone on planet Earth knows who controls Hollywood. Only controlled opposition would support a president that wants to take out Iran, or at least says he does (because Trump, like AJ, is just another puppet), because Iran opposes Israel and Saudi Arabia, and because Iran is maybe the only defense non-Zionist and non-Wahhabi nations in the Middle East have against US-Israeli-Saudi aggression and war. Besides, war with Iran would drive the price of oil so sky-high that no American not a multi-millionaire would never be able to buy gas and drive anywhere…what a way to institute stack and pack Agenda 21 or 2030 cities, than to force everyone with a job to walk or bike to work?

Further, being kicked off YouTube and other platforms (but surprisingly not Twitter) will get AJ to go onto Mike Adams’s new RealVideo platform, which will certainly drive up Adams’s payout take–Jones supposedly had 2.5 million subscribers, who will soon sign up for Real Video. Being kicked off Facebook will allow Jones to join Gab or some other alt-right platform, and then the game is one for others.

Which leads me to this: recourse for all truth-seekers not interested in “choosing a side” (as FromTheTrenchesWorldReport administrator Henry Shively says, and I totally agree with why he says it) between the crazy left and the bogus “freedom fighter” alt-right, and interested in defending our Bill of Rights, which, by defending freedom of speech/religion/press, also includes freedom of thought:

1. Boycott these platforms, any platform that wants to tell you what to think-say-write-create-believe. It will be hard to get off Facebook and YouTube and the rest, but at some point you will love the idea of not wasting hours tweeting nonsense, watching videos that promote falsehood, or “friending” someone you never met. Those dopamain hits messing you up will dissipate, and you will be able to get back to critical thinking.

2. If you simply are relying on these platforms to sell your books or products or whatever, only use these platforms for that purpose, and get the heck off political-SJW-phony-patriot-phony-religious sites that are obstructing your freedom of choice. (Note: If Jesus Christ Himself had a Facebook page, I’d go to it for truth, but since He doesn’t…why should I go to some preacher with an agenda?)

3. Ever hear of talking to people, not tweeting, not selfie-ing, not texting, but actually talking to people face-to-face like us old schoolers do? Here is why talking to real human beings is important–for one thing, body language. Body language will tell one a whole lot more about if that person you are communicating with is actually being truthful. With texting or tweeting, someone might say they totally agree with you while performing sneers or smirks or body language mocking you.

4. Do what Winston Smith did in “1984”–keep a diary of sorts where you can write exactly what you are thinking and then read it later to refresh your belief codes. If you live in a so-called IoT “smart home” that may be your only recourse to the constant surveillance. Plus that way you can hone your writing skills–since they don’t teach writing in public schools hardly anymore.

5. Read books, fiction and non-fiction. And I don’t just mean e-books, but also hard/soft cover printed books that you can actually hold in your hands. Play a musical instrument even if you aren’t an expert at it.

6. If you can write, write your own stories and self-publish them. Unlike the 90s when I self-published my two printed novels Battle of the Band and The Prophesied Band, self-publishing these days is easy and cheap. And you don’t have to do Kindle, either (I am not doing Kindle–their payout sucks!). Try Lulu or Smashwords. Or just make a PDF of it. Everyone now has Adobe Reader or another PDF reader. Kindle or Nook screens even allow for PDFs, from what I heard. If you can draw or do art, or write and play original music, do that. Then upload it (but I would boycott Spotify, though, because of their censorship).

And once your mind is clear of the clutter your “superiors” have foisted on you, you can then take the next step: seek the truth, come up with ways (above ground or underground) to defend your rights, and think outside the box. Because ultimately, it is you that is restricting you. Stop letting “both sides” and their criminal psycho elite masters brainwash you into thinking there is nothing you can do about what they have planned for you. They can and will shut down the free-thinking-truthful internet
because they can, but they cannot control it all. They can barely control themselves, for pity sake!

Note: Gun control? They tried that in Connecticut after Sandy Hoax and it didn’t work. Under Obama and his gun-control minions, more Americans than ever bought guns and ammo. Now they have 3-D gun printing mechanisms for a few thousand dollars, that they think they can ban the downloading of gun-plans when any bit torrent site can publish them for free…you do know about bit-torrent, which moves world-wide from server here to server there, and the govt. can’t track ’em all. Folks, they will have to institute an EMP attack to completely shut down the internet, and they know it. Don’t buy into the enslavement scenario; the only person who can enslave you, is you.

Speculation on the “Take Down of Alex Jones”–Why?

August 7, 2018

First off let me say, IMHO, that Alex Jones is America’s Tommy Robinson of sorts–he’s a Zionist, he’s alt-right, and he thinks he has all the answers to “restore freedom” in the US. Meaning, I believe Alex Jones is like a broken clock–he’s right twice a day. Maybe. Unlike Robinson though, his name really is Alex Jones (as far as I know), and he has made a ton of loot with his InfoWars/PrisonPlanet shtick, screaming into a microphone and all….drama drama drama drama chameleon…where are you, Boy George?

And, while I don’t believe a whole lot of what this dude screams into his mic, he’s got the right to scream it! First Article, aka First Amendment and all that Bill of Rights stuff. As I had said with Tommy Robinson’s wrongful imprisonment–he’s finally out, though–I do not care if he is a Zionist, he has the right to freedom of speech and the press. Same for Alex Jones, and, I presume in the future, Mike Adams, who is setting up his own YouTube alternative platform–as with Jones, Adams is wealthy.

Note: I am not wealthy. But even if I was, I would not be setting up a YouTube channel. I do not need a YouTube channel–I write spiritual and alternative fiction that has a popular culture meme–a rock and roll band that overcomes the ‘dark side’ for the Spirit of Good, and now writing spin-offs as well. I have a website, OmegaBooks, where I write about and sell and promote my books, as well as an OmegaBooks Blog  (that I need to update). My thing is writing, not video-making, and besides, I don’t have the money for the equipment, I don’t have the time for this, and I’m not about to waste the viewer’s time sitting in front of a webcam, speaking into a microphone, sitting in a chair with virtually nothing interesting in the background. And I don’t have a cell phone, either–where I live we have no cell service (and if we did, I wouldn’t own one anyway! Selfies? I am 65 years old with white hair. Not exactly gorgeous if you know what I mean!) Yes, the money would be nice (and I mean money, not bitcoin! if I wanted bitcoin I’d be “monetizing” with Brave browser “wallets” or whatever!), but I’ll take money as it comes from book sales–heck if I had so dire a need for money I’d be selling, not giving away, my  Free PDF e-book ‘The Prodigal Band’ If I really need money badly, God will bless me somehow, so I am not worried about money.

Now that that’s over with, there are some interesting reasons why Alex Jones was banned from YouTube and other platforms and in the near future, others will also be banned, and not just for political reasons. And you want to know why I hate politics!

First, why would techie oligarch platforms ban anyone–aside from the fact that these folks are power-freak psychopaths? (And here is the really strange thing–these folks KNOW they are power-freak psychopaths, because–being anti-humanity techies–that is how they get back at all the so-called “bullies” who “bullied” them in grade school or whatever, so they took on the psychopath persona for revenge. And, as the Bible says, the love of money is the root of all evil.) So why would Zuckerberg or whoever ban someone like Alex Jones, who just happens to be a millionaire? I mean, we’re not talking about some powerless truth teller here! Jones is the rich man’s Daboo7 or Lisa Haven–a click bait artist extraordinaire. Now, Jones, Daboo7 and Lisa gal all have the right to free speech and use click bait, that is their right…but because they often completely muffle or misconstrue the truth, I will expose them for this. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I want truth, not click bait! So why would YouTube and the others ban Jones? Because they can. Period.

And here is where the “public utility” argument comes in. A guy–a leftist, BTW, and a self-proclaimed “former Satanist” (you can see several Satanic symbols on his wall in his videos)–named “stxyhexenhammer666” did a YouTube video stating that if YouTube and other tech oligarch platforms were public utilities, they would not be allowed to ban Jones or anyone else. He’s not the first one to do this–a Jones’ acolyte, Paul Joseph Watson, said the same thing on his channel. Mike Adams, of course, has also done videos about it. And they are right to do so, because it is bad and it is wrong to ban anyone. Yet, I cannot support the “public utility” thing–public utilities are government regulated, for pity sake! Just how long before these politically incorrect channels are “regulated” out of existence? So I don’t think making these companies public utilities will solve any problems (and was this dude around when “Ma Bell” was regulated into what has become AT&T? Just how whoop-tee-doo did that turn out? AT&T, in case you didn’t know, now owns DirecTV and other monopolies!)

But the guy does have a good idea–if you don’t like what YouTube and the rest are doing to Jones and others, just STOP USING THESE PLATFORMS! Boycott YouTube!

Or is that too damned difficult for you?

Unfortunately, it is too difficult for some. And THAT is one reason YouTube and others are banning Jones–YouTube KNOWS that “everyone loves YouTube.”

But here is another reason why YouTube has banned Jones–while a lot of folks love AJ, a lot of folks do NOT love AJ and are whining about whatever he screams into his mic, or perhaps think Paul Joseph Watson is just a shill or don’t like his northern English accent (I myself am a lover of northern English accents) or the way he does his videos. A lot of folks do not like alt-right stuff, and think in these times of political correctness, alt-right anything should be banned. Now it is said that Zuckerberg and the rest are leftists. I don’t know if they are truly leftist or not–and why would a billionaire like Zuckerberg be a socialist, anyway? But he does have an agenda, right? Perhaps those who bullied him in his youth were right wingers? I don’t know. So maybe he is a leftist, but not for the same reasons that typical leftists are leftist.

And here is another reason, maybe, why YouTube banned Jones–to keep up the divide between alt-left and alt-right, which is I TRULY BELIEVE what BOTH the alt-left and the alt-right want! And who wants “divide and conquer” more than those in power, including these tech oligarchs? Further, alternative platforms like Gab (instead of Twitter), Steemit, BitChute and Mike Adam’s Real Video (instead of Facebook or YouTube) and Yandex (instead of Google) or Brave browser (instead of Google Chrome) just love the fact that many folks will now decide to boycott YouTube, as well as Twitter, Facebook and the rest. And don’t these alt platforms WANT folks to boycott YouTube and the others? Of course! So maybe, just maybe, these alt-platforms WANT YouTube to ban Alex Jones and others in the alt-right? Don’t you think maybe these alt-platforms are part of the divide and conquer? Of course they are!

In the next post, I will try to explain how to not fall for any “divide and conquer” scheme, especially in the realm of politics! Hint: It is NOT the Alex Jones’s, the Mike Adams’s, the InvestmentWatchBlog’s, the Tommy Robinson’s, the Libertarian sites like Lew Rockwell and the Ron Paul Institute (which one of the oligarchs also banned)…it is NOT these sites and folks that the criminal psychopathic elites and the tech psycho oligarchs are afraid of. Just like it is not Antifa vs. Trumpers–folks, that’s entertainment, okay? In the next post I will prove just whom the psychos are afraid of.

I will also try to explain why YouTube would ban–a Zionist or two?

 

Here is What I Believe, In Case the Reader is Confused

July 25, 2018

In more than one previous post, I called out the various religions, including Christianity. Since I have “identified” as Christian, that could lead to confusion for the reader. But to say I am a true believer in Jesus Christ would be more accurate. My blogger blog site that I can no longer access and post to (thanks to Google’s reworking of their platform and password usage–they will no longer accept the password I was using, and instead takes me to a completely different page) is called ‘christnotreligion.blogspot.com’ for a reason–I do not “do” religion. All religion is, is man-made doctrine, and all religion has done is make things worse, not better–and anyone in authority who tries to make religion make the world a better place is assassinated for it (just ask Pope John Paul I, who was murdered in the Vatican only about a month after he was elected pope, by a cabal of Vatican evil-doers in service to the oligarch bankers, various secret societies, criminals, and corrupt politicians.).

Here are other ways the various religions have made the world worse, then and now:

  1. Christianity–Christian vs. Christian in all sorts of wars, the Thirty Years War being the most notable, but also, the Catholic vs. Protestant nonsense in Northern Ireland, and the schism of the 300s and 400s between Catholics and the Orthodox groups of the Middle East (Holy Roman Empire vs. Byzantine Empire, for one). And then you have Christian colonials killing natives if they don’t ‘convert’ (folks, forced conversion is NOT CONVERSION, and only makes the religious doctrines even more opposed to the Word of Christ.  Christ said make disciples of all nations, not make phony disciples who are ‘disciples’ so they won’t be killed by the ‘converters.’ And, did Protestantism actually make Christianity that much better? Not when the rulers of these Protestant nations fought against their fellows, and not when the agents of rulers slaughtered ‘pagan’ ‘Indian’ tribes, murdered their food sources (such as mass buffalo die-offs…right–kill millions of God’s creatures for no reason and leave their rotting corpses!) And adopt pagan rituals to get the pagans into the religion…that is, paganize the Word of Christ. That’ll make the world better!
  2. Islam–as with Christianity you have Muslim vs. Muslim, because the Sunnis think the Shiites got it wrong while the Shiites think the Sunnis got it wrong–all over worshiping a rock they call ‘Allah.’ Right. Saudi Arabia (with US and Israel help) wants to destroy Iran because they are Shiite. And the Shiites are no better–remember around the time of the Gulf War the Iraqi Shiites applauded the US burying of thousands of Iraqi soldiers in pits, alive? And wanted US help in deposing Saddam and the Sunni government? Help which never came, of course.  And do I even have to mention their treatment of women? And then you have the division of India into India and West and East Pakistan (the latter which is now Bangladesh) all because starting with Gandhi vs. Jiddah, Hindus could not learn to get along with Muslims. And speaking of Hinduism…
  3. Hinduism–There are a lot of different religions in India besides Hinduism and Islam and even Buddhism. Sihkism began in the 1500s in the Punjab Region in north India extending into Pakistan, and is similar to Hinduism except they only believe in one god, not several. Jainism is another one but I don’t know much about it, and there are others as well, including a sect of Hinduism that the Brits supposedly wiped out in the 1840s called the Thugee Cult which worshiped the Hindu god Kali, a god if death and destruction (kinda like the yin to Shiva’s yang). So why all these different groups? Because Hinduism, with all their various gods, is confusing and (IMHO at least) unsanitary…in a TV show once on rats, it showed a Hindu temple filled with rats–do they actually worship rats? And how does their abominable caste system, where “untouchables” are treated like vermin, make India a better place, or anywhere else a better place? All it does is keep parts of India very very poor. But the Muslim areas are no better. Both Hinduism and Islam are completely man-made based on ‘visions’ or whatnot the founders of these religions claimed to have ‘seen.’
  4. Buddhism–This is a religion that is completely and utterly man-made and not even god-based, but based on some ‘enlightenment’ by some guy from India called Buddha (he had another name but I can’t remember…Siddhartha? Bodhi Darma? Can’t remember.) And the only way to reach enlightenment is to become some kind of dalai lama or guru or something, or meditate, or act in a humble manner. Right. Which is why the 19th century Dalai Lama of Tibet massacred serfs who didn’t obey him, or why the government of Myanmar is today genociding the Muslim Rohingya. And other atrocities in the name of ‘enlightenment’!
  5. Judaism–I have already said enough about Talmudic Judaism in a previous post so I’m not going to regurgitate it here. It is anti-Christ, and it is as divisive as any other religion, and maybe even more so, what with Jews thinking they are better than gentiles, or non-Jews. But if Jews were ‘superior,’ they wouldn’t have to genocide Palestinians, now would they?

And then there is atheism. Having once dabbled in atheism, here is why I dropped it–it made no sense with what was going on in my life, which included two instances of what I called ‘divine intervention,’–one, I was almost human trafficked twice but the ‘trafficker’ let me go, twice. On another occasion I was nearly raped, but the guy stopped it before he really got violent; two, one two occasions when I should have died, once in a car accident and once being stuck in an elevator for 18 hours when it could have been 42 hours with no water, food, or toilet facilities (and I had my menstral period besides!)…the two of us were rescued by a janitor, on a Monday morning about 6 am in a community college i Manhattan–ON YOM KIPPUR! No college in NYC is open on Jewish holidays! Plus, no atheist has ever been able to explain to me why or how God does not exist, how somehow random particles created everything through evolution (which is still considered a ‘theory’ as it is treated as ‘law’–while never being able to ‘prove’ it!), which IMHO is a construct created by atheists to ‘prove’ how everything came into existence because, since they don’t believe in God, why should they believe God created everything? When evolutionists finally get their theory straight, from Darwinism to ‘punctuated equilibrium’ to Dawkinsism to whatever, let me know! (Note: I do NOT believe Creation is science, okay? But neither is evolution–they have no empirical proof!)

Another thing I believe in, or, I should say, try to act under and live by, is the Bill of Rights. Just wanted to let everyone know that. I am not political, but neither is the Bill of Rights and the common law (or natural law) that it stems from. It just might be the only ‘political’ (in a manner of speaking, since it is part of the Declaration of Independence in theory anyway) document that I do act under (but who is to say there is not a spiritual aspect to it as well). Here is why:

Article 1: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This means, one, anyone can believe whatever one wants and exercise freely, which means no Talmudic Jew can send to trial a believer in Christ, and no Christian can shoot someone because that person is Muslim, and other vital freedoms, and no Christian Zionist can force me to buy Israeli humus or Dead Sea salts or whatever.  It means no SJW can tell me I can’t denounce transgenderism or homosexuality, and no Pentacostal can tell me that someone who is gay or transgender needs to be given thirty lashes and expect me to support this. It means I can post whatever on my blogs that I feel is truthful or must be truthful, and no Christian snark can tell me that they won’t buy my books because my characters cuss, and expect me to feel guilty over it! Like I said in a previous post, I’ve never met a Christian who didn’t cuss! Anyone who refuses to allow anyone to peacefully assemble needs to be called out on this, and, as for petitions to redress grievances, I’d say we are on the verge of that being a waste of time with the Feds. But it works locally, still.

Article 2: A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.  Not only does this cancel out bogus ‘gun control,’ but it reinforces the notion that everyone, with proper training, not only has the right to bear arms, but likely should. It is a right, not a privilege! (and remember, for those with training and in their right mind if you know what I mean.)

Article 3: No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Now who would want a soldier in their house as a soldier, war or not war? And I suppose this can now be applied to cops and other ‘law’ enforcers. Folks, during the 1997 Republic of Texas standoff, similar to Waco, Ruby Ridge and other events that never would happened had the US gov. been following the Bill of Rights, there were homes out here in my neck of the woods that were occupied by, among others, Texas Rangers. Without consent, of course, and, in some cases, the ‘soldiers’ forced the residents to lever their homes and the POA it happened in–on lockdown for almost a week. To heck with their dogs, horses, and other livestock!

Article 4: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. I don’t know a Bill of Rights article that has been violated by the thugs running the US govt. more than this one. ANYONE who thinks this article is old fashioned or outdated or needs to be violated on a minute-by-minute basis…well, I know a place that you might like to live in instead: North Korea, People’s Republic of China, the new-school ANC-run South Africa (if you are white), Saudi Arabia (if you are female or lesbian or tranny or not male) or Israel (if you are not Jewish)–pick one! How can one NOT support Article 4? Doncha just love being groped by TSA? Coming to a bus station near you.

Article 5: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Since I was actually violated by the refusal of the local JP to follow Article 5 over a “traffic ticket” that I tried to claim was in violation of the law (the right to travel vs. the ‘privilege to drive’ crap!) and went to jail while I was nursing my eight-month-old daughter–and again the following year for ‘failure to appear’ at this bogus trial by non-jury, I’d say that I definitely support Article 5! And then you have the bogus crap called ’eminent domain’ that worked in New London, CT where many lost their homes to a company that still has not done anything with the property they stole, and that fact that only in Texas (if you aren’t part of an HOA, POA, or other bogus property taxing ‘authority’, that is) can you get actual ownership of your land through allodial title. We tried, but being in a POA, we couldn’t get one. Neither can the local ranchers, who still must pay property tax! (Most of far west Texas either is ‘owned’ by railroads or oil companies.)

Article 6: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. See above, where–since the JP and the rest of the local judges and whatnot have no clue about the Bill of Rights–they couldn’t explain to me the ‘nature and cause of the accusation’ if it hit them in the face, I had to go to jail for no reason other than I was claiming my right to travel! I basically defended myself (and my ‘buddy,’ future ‘Republic of Texas’ leader Rick McLaren, who promised to help me, didn’t do squat!). No way could I afford a lawyer or be able to bribe the judge. I don’t do affluenza!

Article 7: In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.  Too bad the folks running ‘the law’ have no clue about Common Law. And where would you find a fine that did NOT exceed twenty dollars nowadays?

Article 8: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. All that exists now is excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment. But if they can do that in Israel…

Article 9: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. This article is definitely under-rated, as now all we ever hear or see is ‘disparaging other people’ and ‘denial’ of other people’s rights because these other people are not like we are, and, in its own way, dispels the notion that slavery/indentured servitude/sharecropping etc. is ‘legal.’ I cannot think of a better way to disparage someone than to force them to work for nothing (slavery) or to force them to work to death (indenture). If I’m getting the notion of being ‘retained’ by the people correct. Doesn’t getting a ‘retainer’ imply being paid?

Article 10:  The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Acting as though I live under the Bill of Rights is NOT not delegated to the US by the Constitution, and is not prohibited by the states, therefore, I am not only allowed to act under the Bill of Rights, but I must act under the Bill of Rights! Folks, if you don’t use it, you lose it, right?

And folks, living by the Word of Jesus Christ and living by the Bill of Rights–we are NOT obligated to live by Old Testament Judaic ‘law’ folks! And we do NOT need some Christian Reconstructionist ‘religious’ group cult to ‘establish’ a theocracy here which will take away as much if not more of our natural rights as the present criminal govt. had–and I will NOT wear dresses and skirts down to my ankles in 100 degree temps, I will NOT wear my hair like a Mennonite does or ‘spare the rod and beat the child’ like supposedly the book of Proverbs says (it doesn’t say that, but most think it does)–by spiritually following the Word of Christ and physically (in this world) following the Bill of Rights, that is really all we need to be happy and blessed.

We need to be our own leaders, and, having seen what a shyster like Rick McLaren can do to what might seem to be a legitimate movement to restore liberty, I know what I am talking about. It starts with each one of us. We do NOT want a ‘meet the new boss, same as the old boss’ scenario!

Note: the Bill of Rights can be found on the only truly newsworthy site of the alt-media, From the Trenches World Report.