Posts Tagged ‘Free Speech’

The WordPress Take Down of Blogs for Violation of ToS–Is it Personal?

August 15, 2018

Folks, this blog right here you are reading could be next. WordPress, who I thought was above censorship–clearly they are NOT above censorship!–has taken down Dr. Eowyn’s “Fellowship of the Minds” and also, more recently, “American Everyman.” To my knowledge, neither blog has advocated hate speech or violence. Other independent blogs have also been taken down by WordPress. Since I have always like WordPress, this is a bothersome development; further, by taking WordPress to task over this censorship while being on a WordPress site, I may be taken down as well, and soon. I am NOT transferring any blogs to Blogger, however. It’s owner, Google, is even worse!

According to Dr. Eowyn, he has not been given a reason for this take down. Speculation around this appears to blame some “reporter”of something Dr. Eowyn wrote on his blog that perhaps was taken as offensive, advocating hate speech, or violence–according to this person’s opinion. Was it because Eowyn wrote about the take down of Alex Jones? (which on this very here blog I have written about not once, not twice, but thrice!)

Or was it personal? Did Dr. Eowyn “upset” some person, and then this person got revenge?

Because one thing is sure in this world–the days of growing thick skin have passed.

Thank God I have thick skin. When you were bullied as a teen and pre-teen, when you grew up wanting to be playing by yourself with clay figures and writing stories and making up book characters because you felt like everyone else thought you were ‘crazy,’ then the only way to ‘survive’ so to speak is to grow the thickest skin you can.

There are times I actually feel sorry for these thin-skinned SJWs. Emos, without all the make-up. And how will they deal with the world if the world doesn’t go along with their notions?

Advertisements

And Now More “Take Downs”–Why All of a Sudden All These Take Downs, and Now Microsoft is Getting into the Act by Wanting to Take Down Gab

August 9, 2018

If indeed the “take down” of Alex Jones was meant as an actual take down, and not just a scam Jones himself was involved with as I suggested yesterday (because it is rare to truly take down a Zionist), then let me ask this–why now? And I did ask something similar the other day, as to why–but it has turned into “why now”?

I know, I know…the censorship thing has been going on for months, where YouTube would suspend an account for a few days, or Facebook would do the same thing, or Twitter…

But why all of a sudden to begin this week has YouTube removed Alex Jones and InfoWars, followed by others? Nothing in this world is co-incidence. And I don’t have all the answers, but one thing is obvious–the criminal psycho elites must be getting scared or antsy or something for all of this to be getting ramped up now, even against avowed Zionists (do not forget–most of these Big Tech platforms are owned by….do the names Zuckerberg, Bezos, and Schmidt sound like a certain ethnicity or group of people? By the way, AJ, the Arabs do not control Hollywood, okay? So why would Khazarians aka “Jews” want to suppress a Zionist? I hope I can begin to answer this question). And I don’t think it is merely a psy-op or scam.

If one remembers, Facebook has been sued by various entities including the EU, for breach of security regarding something called Cambridge Analytica. Various govt. authorities have also called out Google and Facebook for violating GDPR rules and others. In other words, Big Tech was getting into big trouble, so Big Tech had to, perhaps, reign in the govts. they partially own, and the easiest way to do that is to partner with govts. Could it be that the deal is–as many are now–oh the stupidity!–for calling for govt. to make these Tech Giants “public utilities?” (As that “former Satanist” “styzhexenhammer666”  YouTube video  calls for…see a previous post where I bring up this dude who–on purpose–looks like a rock star–was he with the band Styx?) And, as I state in that post, calling for govts. to make Tech Giants “public utilities” as was done to “Ma Bell” many years ago is one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard!

Let me ask this question: Whom would you rather have censor you–a private company, where there are alternatives such as Gab or ButChute or Steemit you can choose if you so want to do, or the govt., where, because such and such is now a regulated public utility (while still being a private corporation as AT&T–“Ma Bell’s” successor–is still), the state would then have to right to completely abolish the Bill of Rights and its First Article that gives We the People freedom of speech and the press? Just for the convenience of it, you would allow the govt. to completely take away your rights? As I said in the previous past, the only person allowing you to be enslaved is YOU!

Or, would you just rather defend your right to free speech and press by either signing up with Gab or Bitchute and boycotting Facebook or YouTube, or others? Because you still have that choice…

Meanwhile, good ol’ Microsoft (folks, did you really think Apple was the only evil one here?) is fixing to ban Gab (as per this  link at 12160.info, a supposedly social network). Like I said, Big Tech is seemingly co-ordinating together their take down of free speech, including free speech by avowed Zionists.

So that might answer the “why now” question. But why did they begin with Alex Jones?

Because unlike me, or various independent blogs, vlogs, etc. run on either a shoestring budget or less or for free, AJ is a millionaire with one of the biggest outreaches in the US and everywhere else, including employing minions like Paul Jospeh Watson in the UK. That means Alex Jones is, to some extent, major competition for the likes of YouTube and others, and that could be another reason he was taken down first, or at least foremost, since the mainstream media is even going bonkers over it. Or because he has a
huge following. Or because of his Trump support–you might be aware of Trump’s war on Amazon and Jeff Bezos. Right now, at least, it seems like Big Tech is going to war with Not Quite Big Tech, or “Alt- Big-Tech” such as maybe Jones can be categorized as. Look at it this way–if Big Tech can go after the next wrung below them, what do you think they can do to us little guys in the game?

Alex Jones today. Corbett Report–a much more reliable and truthful website/YouTube channel (he does not have Facebook, so he says)–tomorrow. Somethinghappeninghere.wordpress.com a month from now? Heck, Google’s Blogger has already screwed me over! And will they take down WordPress, the ONLY true alternative to Google’s Blogger that I know of?

Prepare, folks, prepare.

Was the “Take Down of Alex Jones” Truly a Take Down?

August 8, 2018

I will begin by quoting the question with which I ended my previous post: ‘I will also try to explain why YouTube would ban–a Zionist or two?’

Exactly. Why would YouTube and other tech oligarch platforms ban two avowed Zionists–Tommy Robinson and Alex Jones?

One answer would be because they can: the owners of tech platforms can (to heck with freedom of speech and the press) ban whomever they want, and that is why they are doing it, and no declaration of “public utility” is going to change that–the regulators will see to that!

The answer that I think (with the two being avowed Zionists and all) makes a lot more sense is because Big Tech wants these two individuals to be banned in order to foster their agendas–what better way to piss off “conservatives” or “patriots” than to ban Alex Jones (and in England, Tommy Robinson)? And won’t these “pissed off” folks want to take it out on Antifa and like-minded SJWs and their fellow Soros-ian sock-puppets? And what better way to institute the “coming Civil War” Lisa Click-Bait and others are constantly spouting and driving toward? And what better way to completely divide and conquer us “useless eater/little people/dumbed down idiots” than to instigate a bogus civil
war where Antifa and Co. and “Conservative Patriots-MAGAs” kill each other off. And then, after Antifa and Alex Jones/InfoWars and all the other like-minded sites and videos and podcasts are gone, the rest of us who did not fall for this crap will be left with virtually nothing, online or offline truth- wise. And don’t forget, Big Tech and the govts. they own actually think the rest of us will be dependent on them for anything.

There is even the possibility (though I cannot prove it) that Alex Jones, at least, went along with the whole “take down” deal! This man, really really really, is controlled opposition–his avowed Zionism proves that. Only controlled opposition would denounce the “new world order” while defending Israel’s genocide of Palestinians! (By not denouncing this genocide, Alex, you are ultimately defending it!) Only controlled opposition would make the ridiculous claim that “the Arabs control Hollywood,” when everyone on planet Earth knows who controls Hollywood. Only controlled opposition would support a president that wants to take out Iran, or at least says he does (because Trump, like AJ, is just another puppet), because Iran opposes Israel and Saudi Arabia, and because Iran is maybe the only defense non-Zionist and non-Wahhabi nations in the Middle East have against US-Israeli-Saudi aggression and war. Besides, war with Iran would drive the price of oil so sky-high that no American not a multi-millionaire would never be able to buy gas and drive anywhere…what a way to institute stack and pack Agenda 21 or 2030 cities, than to force everyone with a job to walk or bike to work?

Further, being kicked off YouTube and other platforms (but surprisingly not Twitter) will get AJ to go onto Mike Adams’s new RealVideo platform, which will certainly drive up Adams’s payout take–Jones supposedly had 2.5 million subscribers, who will soon sign up for Real Video. Being kicked off Facebook will allow Jones to join Gab or some other alt-right platform, and then the game is one for others.

Which leads me to this: recourse for all truth-seekers not interested in “choosing a side” (as FromTheTrenchesWorldReport administrator Henry Shively says, and I totally agree with why he says it) between the crazy left and the bogus “freedom fighter” alt-right, and interested in defending our Bill of Rights, which, by defending freedom of speech/religion/press, also includes freedom of thought:

1. Boycott these platforms, any platform that wants to tell you what to think-say-write-create-believe. It will be hard to get off Facebook and YouTube and the rest, but at some point you will love the idea of not wasting hours tweeting nonsense, watching videos that promote falsehood, or “friending” someone you never met. Those dopamain hits messing you up will dissipate, and you will be able to get back to critical thinking.

2. If you simply are relying on these platforms to sell your books or products or whatever, only use these platforms for that purpose, and get the heck off political-SJW-phony-patriot-phony-religious sites that are obstructing your freedom of choice. (Note: If Jesus Christ Himself had a Facebook page, I’d go to it for truth, but since He doesn’t…why should I go to some preacher with an agenda?)

3. Ever hear of talking to people, not tweeting, not selfie-ing, not texting, but actually talking to people face-to-face like us old schoolers do? Here is why talking to real human beings is important–for one thing, body language. Body language will tell one a whole lot more about if that person you are communicating with is actually being truthful. With texting or tweeting, someone might say they totally agree with you while performing sneers or smirks or body language mocking you.

4. Do what Winston Smith did in “1984”–keep a diary of sorts where you can write exactly what you are thinking and then read it later to refresh your belief codes. If you live in a so-called IoT “smart home” that may be your only recourse to the constant surveillance. Plus that way you can hone your writing skills–since they don’t teach writing in public schools hardly anymore.

5. Read books, fiction and non-fiction. And I don’t just mean e-books, but also hard/soft cover printed books that you can actually hold in your hands. Play a musical instrument even if you aren’t an expert at it.

6. If you can write, write your own stories and self-publish them. Unlike the 90s when I self-published my two printed novels Battle of the Band and The Prophesied Band, self-publishing these days is easy and cheap. And you don’t have to do Kindle, either (I am not doing Kindle–their payout sucks!). Try Lulu or Smashwords. Or just make a PDF of it. Everyone now has Adobe Reader or another PDF reader. Kindle or Nook screens even allow for PDFs, from what I heard. If you can draw or do art, or write and play original music, do that. Then upload it (but I would boycott Spotify, though, because of their censorship).

And once your mind is clear of the clutter your “superiors” have foisted on you, you can then take the next step: seek the truth, come up with ways (above ground or underground) to defend your rights, and think outside the box. Because ultimately, it is you that is restricting you. Stop letting “both sides” and their criminal psycho elite masters brainwash you into thinking there is nothing you can do about what they have planned for you. They can and will shut down the free-thinking-truthful internet
because they can, but they cannot control it all. They can barely control themselves, for pity sake!

Note: Gun control? They tried that in Connecticut after Sandy Hoax and it didn’t work. Under Obama and his gun-control minions, more Americans than ever bought guns and ammo. Now they have 3-D gun printing mechanisms for a few thousand dollars, that they think they can ban the downloading of gun-plans when any bit torrent site can publish them for free…you do know about bit-torrent, which moves world-wide from server here to server there, and the govt. can’t track ’em all. Folks, they will have to institute an EMP attack to completely shut down the internet, and they know it. Don’t buy into the enslavement scenario; the only person who can enslave you, is you.

Speculation on the “Take Down of Alex Jones”–Why?

August 7, 2018

First off let me say, IMHO, that Alex Jones is America’s Tommy Robinson of sorts–he’s a Zionist, he’s alt-right, and he thinks he has all the answers to “restore freedom” in the US. Meaning, I believe Alex Jones is like a broken clock–he’s right twice a day. Maybe. Unlike Robinson though, his name really is Alex Jones (as far as I know), and he has made a ton of loot with his InfoWars/PrisonPlanet shtick, screaming into a microphone and all….drama drama drama drama chameleon…where are you, Boy George?

And, while I don’t believe a whole lot of what this dude screams into his mic, he’s got the right to scream it! First Article, aka First Amendment and all that Bill of Rights stuff. As I had said with Tommy Robinson’s wrongful imprisonment–he’s finally out, though–I do not care if he is a Zionist, he has the right to freedom of speech and the press. Same for Alex Jones, and, I presume in the future, Mike Adams, who is setting up his own YouTube alternative platform–as with Jones, Adams is wealthy.

Note: I am not wealthy. But even if I was, I would not be setting up a YouTube channel. I do not need a YouTube channel–I write spiritual and alternative fiction that has a popular culture meme–a rock and roll band that overcomes the ‘dark side’ for the Spirit of Good, and now writing spin-offs as well. I have a website, OmegaBooks, where I write about and sell and promote my books, as well as an OmegaBooks Blog  (that I need to update). My thing is writing, not video-making, and besides, I don’t have the money for the equipment, I don’t have the time for this, and I’m not about to waste the viewer’s time sitting in front of a webcam, speaking into a microphone, sitting in a chair with virtually nothing interesting in the background. And I don’t have a cell phone, either–where I live we have no cell service (and if we did, I wouldn’t own one anyway! Selfies? I am 65 years old with white hair. Not exactly gorgeous if you know what I mean!) Yes, the money would be nice (and I mean money, not bitcoin! if I wanted bitcoin I’d be “monetizing” with Brave browser “wallets” or whatever!), but I’ll take money as it comes from book sales–heck if I had so dire a need for money I’d be selling, not giving away, my  Free PDF e-book ‘The Prodigal Band’ If I really need money badly, God will bless me somehow, so I am not worried about money.

Now that that’s over with, there are some interesting reasons why Alex Jones was banned from YouTube and other platforms and in the near future, others will also be banned, and not just for political reasons. And you want to know why I hate politics!

First, why would techie oligarch platforms ban anyone–aside from the fact that these folks are power-freak psychopaths? (And here is the really strange thing–these folks KNOW they are power-freak psychopaths, because–being anti-humanity techies–that is how they get back at all the so-called “bullies” who “bullied” them in grade school or whatever, so they took on the psychopath persona for revenge. And, as the Bible says, the love of money is the root of all evil.) So why would Zuckerberg or whoever ban someone like Alex Jones, who just happens to be a millionaire? I mean, we’re not talking about some powerless truth teller here! Jones is the rich man’s Daboo7 or Lisa Haven–a click bait artist extraordinaire. Now, Jones, Daboo7 and Lisa gal all have the right to free speech and use click bait, that is their right…but because they often completely muffle or misconstrue the truth, I will expose them for this. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I want truth, not click bait! So why would YouTube and the others ban Jones? Because they can. Period.

And here is where the “public utility” argument comes in. A guy–a leftist, BTW, and a self-proclaimed “former Satanist” (you can see several Satanic symbols on his wall in his videos)–named “stxyhexenhammer666” did a YouTube video stating that if YouTube and other tech oligarch platforms were public utilities, they would not be allowed to ban Jones or anyone else. He’s not the first one to do this–a Jones’ acolyte, Paul Joseph Watson, said the same thing on his channel. Mike Adams, of course, has also done videos about it. And they are right to do so, because it is bad and it is wrong to ban anyone. Yet, I cannot support the “public utility” thing–public utilities are government regulated, for pity sake! Just how long before these politically incorrect channels are “regulated” out of existence? So I don’t think making these companies public utilities will solve any problems (and was this dude around when “Ma Bell” was regulated into what has become AT&T? Just how whoop-tee-doo did that turn out? AT&T, in case you didn’t know, now owns DirecTV and other monopolies!)

But the guy does have a good idea–if you don’t like what YouTube and the rest are doing to Jones and others, just STOP USING THESE PLATFORMS! Boycott YouTube!

Or is that too damned difficult for you?

Unfortunately, it is too difficult for some. And THAT is one reason YouTube and others are banning Jones–YouTube KNOWS that “everyone loves YouTube.”

But here is another reason why YouTube has banned Jones–while a lot of folks love AJ, a lot of folks do NOT love AJ and are whining about whatever he screams into his mic, or perhaps think Paul Joseph Watson is just a shill or don’t like his northern English accent (I myself am a lover of northern English accents) or the way he does his videos. A lot of folks do not like alt-right stuff, and think in these times of political correctness, alt-right anything should be banned. Now it is said that Zuckerberg and the rest are leftists. I don’t know if they are truly leftist or not–and why would a billionaire like Zuckerberg be a socialist, anyway? But he does have an agenda, right? Perhaps those who bullied him in his youth were right wingers? I don’t know. So maybe he is a leftist, but not for the same reasons that typical leftists are leftist.

And here is another reason, maybe, why YouTube banned Jones–to keep up the divide between alt-left and alt-right, which is I TRULY BELIEVE what BOTH the alt-left and the alt-right want! And who wants “divide and conquer” more than those in power, including these tech oligarchs? Further, alternative platforms like Gab (instead of Twitter), Steemit, BitChute and Mike Adam’s Real Video (instead of Facebook or YouTube) and Yandex (instead of Google) or Brave browser (instead of Google Chrome) just love the fact that many folks will now decide to boycott YouTube, as well as Twitter, Facebook and the rest. And don’t these alt platforms WANT folks to boycott YouTube and the others? Of course! So maybe, just maybe, these alt-platforms WANT YouTube to ban Alex Jones and others in the alt-right? Don’t you think maybe these alt-platforms are part of the divide and conquer? Of course they are!

In the next post, I will try to explain how to not fall for any “divide and conquer” scheme, especially in the realm of politics! Hint: It is NOT the Alex Jones’s, the Mike Adams’s, the InvestmentWatchBlog’s, the Tommy Robinson’s, the Libertarian sites like Lew Rockwell and the Ron Paul Institute (which one of the oligarchs also banned)…it is NOT these sites and folks that the criminal psychopathic elites and the tech psycho oligarchs are afraid of. Just like it is not Antifa vs. Trumpers–folks, that’s entertainment, okay? In the next post I will prove just whom the psychos are afraid of.

I will also try to explain why YouTube would ban–a Zionist or two?