“Eyes of the Devil”: Disgusting and Disturbing or Not, This Video Must Go Viral

“Eyes of the Devil” A Documentary Film by Patryk Vega–a true hero in my opinion–is about a woman who is trying to sell her unborn baby to human traffickers. Many will not be able to complete watching the film, it is so disturbing and even disgusting… How can a woman bearing a child live with herself wanting to traffick this baby to evil people? And in fact the film doesn’t really explain why she does this other than perhaps for money. But clearly this woman is disturbed herself, I have no idea why or how.

But why this film needs to go viral is not because of the woman, but because of the trafficking of babies, young children, teens, adults into brothels, for “spare parts” (organs), sadism, psychopathic pleasures, Satanism, and the like, mostly for the pleasure of what I call the criminal psychopathic elites and like-minded super rich persons without conscience and perhaps out of boredom can’t get enough violent porn or adrenochrome (yes, adrenochrome extraction for tortured babies and children is mentioned in the movie. We all know by now many Hollywood superstars love to imbibe baby blood.)

This evil needs to be exposed, period. The criminal psycho elites and their cronies need to be exposed as the evil they are. And women who are pregnant wanting to sell their babies need to understand this selling will not help them, financially or otherwise, and they need to stop it! Not abort, not sell baby, but do the right thing and not get pregnant in the first place if they can’t handle it!

WARNING! This film should only be viewed by adults. NOT FOR CHILDREN!

Several worthy news sites have already posted this video, including Health Impact News and those that posted from there onto other sites for sharing. I saw the video at this link:

here.

And this is the video Eyes of the Devil by Polish film maker Patryk Vega:

My Issues with the Roman Catholic Church. Plus: Video of a Horrifying Experience of a Carmelite Nun

Merry Christmas!

First of all I want to say–though I likely have already said it–I grew up Catholic, went to Parochial school from grades one through four, then insisted on going to Public School because I was tired of bullies, tired of not learning any science–they taught Catechism, not science, in parochial schools! Or they did then in the 50s and 60s, anyway–and tired of mean teachers (the one nun I had in second grade was really good though), and tired of “threats” of “the spanking machine” (which turned out to be the “mother superior” head nun spanking a student, not a “machine”). Of course I was also bullied in public school, but the bully got hers toward the end of the school year in fifth grade–she nearly died of some form of lukemia or something! (By then we had made up though. She never bullied me again!) Further, I went to “mass” every Sunday, of course, with or without parents, or with friends.

I may have already mentioned as well that my mother grew up Catholic but my father grew up Episcopal. Back then when a Catholic married a Protestant it was considered a “mixed marriage.” The Catholic Church didn’t like for that to happen; because of this my parents had to marry in a rectory, not a church! And things haven’t changed much, either. Nowadays, when a Catholic marries a Catholic both have to do what is called a “Pre-Marital Inventory” (PMI) run by some lay person connected to this program. When I married my (nominally) Catholic husband in a Catholic church in a tiny far west Texas town, I had taken the PMI but my husband did not (since there were no PMI folks there, so the church allowed it anyway!). And when my own son–we are non-denominational–married a Catholic, who did or did not take the PMI, they had to marry in a park near a hotel in San Antonio, by a secular marriage person, not a priest or pastor or minister. My son’s wife still attends Catholic church and our grandson does attend a Catholic day care since both work, but my son has not converted to Roman Catholicism. Fine with me!

By the way, Parochial schools do now teach science, but in the upper grades more than the lower grades, but all grades do teach science (likely not evolution, though…fine with me since evolution is simply a construct made up by atheists to “prove” God does not exist! As if evolutionists have empirical evidence that man evolved from ape, or dinos evolved from birds! No “missing link,” no evolution “fact”!). Further, I do believe that in some ways the Catholic church has improved some…in the early 60s most churches began masses in English (or whatever the spoken language was), not Latin; nuns and priests aren’t as strict regarding whether someone is Catholic or Protestant (and the Parochial school I teacher-assisted at in St. Pete, Florida, actually allowed some non-Catholic students!), and lay Catholics don’t seem to mind too much if a fellow Christian is non-Catholic, or another religion.

But I still have issues, which began when my parents were constantly arguing over the Pope’s “infallibility” and the various decrees that came out of the Vatican from Pope John XXIII in the 50s and 60s, and the Pope Paul VI later. I can also say that in comparing the teachers I had in Catholic school with those in Public school, I’d say the Public school teachers were a heckuva lot better than the lay teachers who (prompted by the nuns, maybe?) tended toward meanness.

I will list a few issues here, then post the horrifying video of a Carmelite nun in the earlier 20th century who was brutalized by the cloistered convent (the country is not mentioned, but I suspect Ireland or maybe Canada…it was likely not the US, but English almost had to have been spoken in this country) and its Mother Superior–and raped by priests and bishops!

First of all, the murder of Pope John Paul I–and David Yallop’s book “In God’s Name: an Investigation into the Murder of Pope John Paul I” proves he was murdered by Vatican and non-Vatican officials and members of a Masonic lodge called P2 with Mafia connections. Why? Because this good pope–the last good pope IMHO–was about to clean up the corrupt Vatican Bank, remake the Catholic church into a truly Christ-driven church which would help the poor, etc., and stop the Vatican arms dealing, among other things. If you have no idea about what this Pope was like, buy or watch on YouTube (in very poor quality, but still) the movie starring Robbie Coltrane called “The Pope Must Die” (aka “The Pope Must Diet”) The “Pope Dave” character resembles Pope John Paul I in many ways, including his actual name, as Pope John Paul I actual last name was Albino. Satire, but true in a lot of respects.

Second of all, why is today’s Vatican hanging out with dictators, secret society leaders and phony charity leaders and celebrity phonies like U2’s Bono–the globalist among rock stars–and other evil-minded oligarchs, banksters and the like? Are these Vatican folks trying to convert these reprobates to repentance and acceptance of Christ as Savior? Or just “in it for the money” when the Vatican is one of the wealthiest institutions on earth?

And then there the pedophilia thing…it’s all over the news. I don’t have time to post all the links, okay? Because in the US and elsewhere, it is rampant!

Before I post the video, let me say also that I once met a woman of old age, the mother of a Pastor we had out here in our POA non-denominational church who once was about to become a nun. It’s by the grace of God she did not! For the time frame of her wanting to become a nun–but then meeting a man she decided to marry–matches the time frame of this former Carmelite nun’s horror story within her cloistered convent. And folks, this really is horrifying! But, folks, you cannot make this stuff up! Here is the video:

Torture of young Carmelite Nun

Don’t Judge, Lest You Be Judged

Jesus , my Lord and Savior, said those very words in some Gospel, don’t remember which one. And these words by the only Man Who never lied are words I need to take to heart, truly.

Because sometimes on comments, regardless of issue within the article,  I can be judgmental, thinking I’m right and the author or commentor is wrong, or being snarky or sarcastic or “offensive” to the one I am commenting about.

While writing posts about Tommy Robinson and his ridiculous arrest I made some off-hand comments about ‘maybe Benjamine Netanyahu should bail him out’ since Robinson is an avowed Zionist. Well, that really set off the writer of the article–I won’t mention her name, and she’s not a Brit, by the way, but American, and writes for Investment Watchblog–who “begged my pardon,” said “you don’t know me but I know you,” (as if she was trolling for an Intel agency, Mossad perhaps?) and, last but not least, told me, “God have mercy” on my “soul.” Well naturally I replied to that with “beg your own pardon” and other screeds, but also warned her about her own Zionist position, being (likely) a Gentile as well as a woman, with a warning about her need to read the Talmud.

Now this post is about judging others, and, screed or not, she sent me a message I needed–though I was being snarky, I should not have been snarky just because Tommy boy is a Zionist (folks, if he wasn’t a Zionist, I would not have been snarky!). For Robinson is likely a Zionist ONLY because he hates Muslims (well, maybe not all Muslims, but Muslims in general, and is a self-described Islamophobe), not because he loves Jews or the Talmud or is a Christian Zionist. But I really don’t know why he called himself a Zionist in some videos. So right now I am asking my Lord and Savior Christ to keep me from temptation to be snarky to Zionists, Christian or otherwise.

As for the writer of the post I was snarky to, I have apologized to her. Whether she cares if I did nor not, is up to her.

Here is why folks tend to be judgmental about other folks. The judgmental person opposes a political party or religion or ethnicity or race or sex or class or job position or societal position or celebrity of another person (that’s right–we really shouldn’t even judge celebrities, no matter how depraved we think they are….that’s just one message I give within my Prodigal Band series. )  So that judgmental person verbally or otherwise attacks someone just because of that COLLECTIVE that person belongs to.

Few articles by anyone speak to that point better than Julie Bindel’s post here., about grooming gangs that are generally made up of Pakistani Muslims, where she says that these “groomers” don’t do it because they are Pakistani Muslim, but because they are evil persons. Yes, she actually wrote this SPOT ON–these men do it NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE MUSLIM! Let me repeat that–BEING MUSLIM DOES NOT MAKE ONE EVIL! Good on Julie Bindel!

In my previous post I did my best to skewer Talmudic Judaism, because in its hatred of Jesus Christ, the ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF FATHER GOD whom these Talmudics claim to believe in–not because of their evil attitude toward Gentiles and Christians. But here is the thing. I did NOT skewer Talmudic Jews, or any Jews for that matter. I have also bad-mouthed Islam, especially its treatment of women. But I have not bathmouthed Muslims. I have even excoriated Christian Zionism as well as Christian Identity, but, because I hold Christians to a higher standard, I HAVE excoriated Christian Zionists, and perhaps Christian Identity as well (because they tend to be racist as well as anti-semitic.). But in a later post I did repent of excoriating Christian Zionists–after all, I used to be one!

In my (not always) humble opinion—and remember these are opinions–the reason so much back-biting happens in comments online is collectivism–you don’t like a comment because the comment seems to be coming from someone you think is a member of a collective you don’t agree with. And NO TOPIC anywhere gets the kind of backlash as comments to articles and posts dealing with either politics or religion. It is not race, class, sex, sexual orientation, nationality, ethnicity, or status within society that garners the most hate-spewing, but either politics or religion–or both.

And, folks, aside from any position I imagine Christian Zionism holds toward Palestinians in and outside of Israel (now, really–do most Christian Zionists really favor genocide of Palestinians? I do have my doubts!), and aside from what I suspect their real feelings are about Jews (do they really want two-thirds of the world’s Jews to be slaughtered just so they can be ‘raptured’? I have my doubts here as well), my biggest issue with Christian Zionism is that it is so damned political! CUFI, Christians United for Israel headed by John Hagee, is a POLITICAL organization, not a religious one. AIPAC, largely supported by Christian Zionists, is POLITICAL, not religious. Now a Christian Zionist can believe whatever he or she wants to believe, that is between he or she and God.

But when you mix politics and religion, you are making for yourself a toxic brew. And, as I finally figured out, mixing politics and religion can really make one judgmental!

Don’t judge, lest you be judged.

Update (Sort of) on the Tommy Robinson Case and Media Blackout

I am going to repeat one thing I said in the previous post here, about former EDL leader Tommy Robinson (who goes by other names as well): I don’t care if the guy is a Zionist–the man has a right to freedom of speech (something Talmudic Jews would deny us Gentiles!), Zionist or not, Jewish or not. Because unlike Talmudic Jews and Chabaders who would only grant those rights to Jews (actually, Jews that agree with their Talmudic agenda–they don’t think Jews like Gilad Aztmon or other Jews who oppose Zionism have a right to free speech either….Atzmon has actually been called an “anti-semite”! You believe this nonsense?) So, unlike the Synagogue of Satan, I believe every human has the right to free speech. Just wanted to make that clear, folks!

Apparently, according to Robinson’s wife, he is indeed in Hull Prison, and, according to this video, Robinson is safe and is not being attacked by Muslims or anyone else. Another thing I need to say if I didn’t make it clear in the previous post is that Robinson is in jail for no legal reason…as Godfrey Bloom, an EU minister (who favored Brexit BTW), states in the video, Robinson was arrested outside the jurisdiction of the Crown Court in Leeds, that is, on the street outside the courtroom, which is illegal, and one of the videos shows the court case judge was watching the arrest from his window, which normally would mean he’d have to recuse himself, which did not happen, again illegally. Thus, Robinson’s imprisonment is illegal, and, I don’t care if he is a Zionist, he needs to be released from jail (again, Talmudic Jews wouldn’t see it that way, even if Robinson fully supports Israel!)

Interestingly enough, another video shows world-wide protests against his incarceration–including a small one in Israel! Jews protesting on behalf of Gentiles? Who woulda thunk it? (But again, is Robinson a Gentile? This may not matter, but it may matter… As anti-Zionist Baptist preacher Stephen Anderson of a church in Arizona and maker the the video “Marching to Zion” has shown in one of his videos, virtually every person on this planet just might have Jewish DNA in them! But would that matter to Talmudists? Remember–Jesus Christ is descended from Judah through the line of David! Thus, isn’t Jesus a Jew? And we all know how Talmudists feel about Jesus!)

So that it could be the protests are about supporting freedom of speech and the press, regardless of who Robinson might be descended from. And I’m not a fan of Robinson or EDL, but I do support his right to free speech and reporting on an issue that is seemingly killing Britain, a country I visited once, in 1970 as a graduation gift.

As for the media–since the UK media was “D-Noticed” and since most of the mainstream UK media is owned by the government (such as the BBC–which is why there is a tax on TV and a tax on usage of TV along with the council tax and all that), the D-Notice makes sense in a nefarious sort of way, even if it is making the government and media look like traitors and idiots!

Now this “update” isn’t about the actual event, but why? Why (again, Zionist or not) is a man reporting on the crimes of grooming gangs being arrested as if he had actually committed a serious crime, such as murder or rape or drugs or theft? Why has a man who supposedly is exposing grooming gangs put in jail, and why, having been in jail before, did the prison authorities look the other way when Muslim gangsters beat the crap out of him, and why do these authorities allow criminals to threaten his family?

Is it a Tommy Robinson thing or is it a pedophilia thing? Are pedophiles high up in government using Muslim grooming gangs to traffick children to these pedophiles high up in government, which is why (according to Bloom) it is ILLEGAL to criticize Islam? Not because it is a terrible thing to criticize Islam, but because Islamists are aiding the elites in their depraved behavior, so folks in the UK cannot criticize Islam–because criticizing Islam is paramount to criticizing the pedophilia of the elites!

Another clue–back in the early 2000s Pete Townsend—do I even have to mention Who he is, pun intended?–was arrested because he was on some pedophile list because, in researching for a book he was writing, he visited a pedophile website. I do not know the outcome of that, but the fact is Townsend went to that site once in order to look up info in pedophiles. Perhaps Townsend, who I am sure still has lots of money, bribed his way out of it. But Townsend, when he wrote music for the Who’s rock opera Tommy (now is that a coincidence or what? Tommy?), mentioned in a song about the character ‘wicked uncle Ernie’ who ‘fiddled about’ on Tommy–‘fiddle about’ is slang for child sex. Townsend, he claims, was researching pedophilia because he was a victim of it, hence the Ernie character–the man was giving Who fans a clue about his earlier life, perhaps? So was Townsend arrested because he was supposedly a pedophile, or because he was writing in his book about exposing pedophilia among the Brit elites (whom I am sure Townsend hung out with at times, being a rock star and all)?

Because as the Jimmy Saville scandals and the Jeffrey Epstein scandals and the scandals involving the Royal Family (such as Kamloops Native school in British Columbia, Canada, where top level students were murdered while the Royals were visiting) and other elitists such as former Prime Ministers (like Edward Heath) at places like Dolphin Square, Jersey island and other places over the last 40 plus years has shown, pedophilia among the high and mighty in Britain is very well known internationally and is something the elites must deal with if they are going to maintain power.

Which is why even if Robinson is a Zionist and does support Israel–a world-leading trafficker nation of human trafficking and sex slavery, BTW–he just might be in jail precisely because he is exposing one of the continuing worst-kept-secrets of the criminal psycho elites in the UK. And that might actually be the only reason!